Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There is a little room for doubt that, nowadays, there has been a staggering growth in environmental pollution posing a detrimental threat to mankind. While a number of individual regards that these obstacles should be tackled internationally, however, I would contend that handling these issues country-wise will bring better outcomes.
On one hand, it is inevitable that governmental bodies of the country can create new laws and implement at the national level. For this reason, the process of saving nature will be invigorated. Furthermore, public awareness programs, undertaken by national authorities, can also have a profound positive impact on nature. Therefore, the condition will be drastically improved having a positive impact nationally as well as globally. Bangladesh, for example, has introduced a new law of banning two-stroke driven vehicles from the streets and launched a vigorous awareness program to alleviate air pollution.
Conversely, international initiatives also play some role in this menace which includes creating new laws and treaties between the countries. This will, therefore, minimize environmental hazards owing to man-made causes like industrialization, logging, deforestation etc. In addition, these associations may also compel the hazard-making countries to compensate the sufferer nations, although, these agreements are not effective in most of the cases. For example, Bangladesh, a South Asian small country, seeking compensation from the high carbon-emitting countries like China, USA and unfortunately, they have not been paid yet due to the international red tape.
All things considered, we, the inhabitants of the world, are in the brink of irreversible damage of our nature. I personally believe, initiatives to save our environment should be adopted by industrialized nations and it will generate a positive impact as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80487804878 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.403159273 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651567944251 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5989412366 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0664713377916 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0206896200743 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282827163908 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435348761398 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279426544068 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.