Some people think the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for country development and progress. To what extent do you agree?
Some argue that science education should be invested rather than remaining subjects to progress the development of a country. In my opinion, though science subjects are the key to advancement, others also play a vital role in sustainable development. Therefore, I only partially agree with the above argument.
On the one hand, science subjects like mathematics, physics, chemistry, and technology benefit the growth of a country undoubtedly. The innovations of technology are witnessed everywhere. Numerous discussions and conferences on the Industrial Revolution 4.0 and the future of biotechnology lead the governments to pay more and more attention to science education. Hence, investment in science subjects is obviously necessary and worthy for the country and the entire world.
On the other hand, subjects in language, business, and personal development are also beneficial for the growth of society, in term of sustainable development. Language training specifically supports global communication from which one country can gain a better connection to one another to share mutual interests and development strategies. A well-invested business training program will educate business insiders with professional trading skill sets who will know how to run a business with less risk of bankruptcy and better commitment to the trading policy. Additionally, a person who was well-trained by personal development courses will perform better in all areas they are participating in, as a result, bring positive effects to the development of the country where they live.
In conclusion, investment in science subjects is essential for advancement; nevertheless, the government should also consider a proper budget for other subjects to acquire a progressive development sustainably.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80228136882 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31569836218 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58174904943 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7237379937 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334268895748 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120482560337 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112514827106 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22608157842 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917156686927 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.