Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that the artists should be sponsored by the government, others think that supporting them is a waste of money. In this essay, I will discuss both the arguments and express my view with the relevant examples.
To commence with, few artists are God-gifted. They have unbelievable talent which can be mesmerizing. If such art is not showcased, it will be unworthy. Funding artists like painters, musicians and poets can help them to reach and perform on international platforms. It is a kind of service to the public. For instance, the Chief Minister of Mumbai City holds an audition for the incoming stream of participants every year. Besides, another reason to help them is to help the nation and promote the cultural heritage. Finally, the legendary artists return to the country in some or the other way.
On the other hand, few indeed think that supporting such people can be a waste of money if it is not beneficial for their own country. This is because spending on an individual sometimes proves useless, as compared to the public welfare. They can look after social issues such as poverty, development, and education. Moreover, the state should decide cautiously as it is the taxes filed by citizens. For instance, the centralized money is invested in production for some events only for a day. Furthermore, these responsibilities might affect the economy.
In my opinion, I moderately agree with the latter argument, as this is an utter waste of funds on an individual. The government should limit the quota to art holders as the private sector already invests in them for business purposes instead.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01465201465 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82049379186 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0522179293 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0555555556 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296594477393 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737868258573 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10278264678 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191856998136 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133762975495 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01465201465 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82049379186 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586080586081 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0522179293 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.0555555556 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296594477393 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737868258573 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10278264678 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191856998136 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133762975495 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.