Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether international car-free days are a good way to help reduce air pollution or there are other ways to tackle this problem. While encouraging people not to use cars is good for the environment, I believe that there are several ways that are more effective.
On the one hand, car-free days is an important way to solve the pollution problem. Since a high proportion of exhausted gas is produced by cars, it is better if more people recognize and reduce their car driving time. Instead, it could be a greater help when individuals change their type of vehicle into some that are more friendly to the environment such as bike. Moreover, by not using cars, we will not demand a huge amount of fuel; this leads to lesser demands on mineral exploitation. Therefore, the environment will not be polluted because of human needs.
On the other hand, there are more effective ways to deal with air pollution. Firstly, governments can invest more money into education. By doing this, we can teach children to throw used garbages in the right places, and thus, the air will not be polluted by the the smell of wasted products. Secondly, people can run campaigns that encourage families to grow small plants in their houses. When more and more people are willing to join these campaigns, it will eventually help the air cleaner in the long term.
In conclusion, it is understandable that some individuals think international car-free days are an effective way to solve air pollution, but it seems to me that there are still other ways to tackle this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, the environment will not be polluted because of human needs. On the other ...
^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...d thus, the air will not be polluted by the the smell of wasted products. Secondly, peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...d thus, the air will not be polluted by the the smell of wasted products. Secondly, peo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86397058824 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67438661192 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540441176471 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.547719766 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303217326306 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108410381912 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128397911717 0.0667982634062 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22608496364 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13092922088 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.