Some people think that it is best for extended families to live together Other people think that it is best for the nuclear family to live away from the extended family Which one do you prefer

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is best for extended families to live together Other people think that it is best for the nuclear family to live away from the extended family Which one do you prefer

The concept of living in a nuclear family has been booming for last decade. Families have been getting smaller day by day. Concerning to this, it is generally argued that people living with their relatives with secondary blood relationship is an ideal form of family. On contrary, it is also believed nuclear family is more sustainable model of family. Being a supporter of medieval cultures, I prefer living in an extended family, which will be based by further discourse.
There are myriad of impelling reasons of living in an extended family. Firstly, such a big family lives under blessings of aged family members, who have profuse amount of experience to spend life with the best possible comfort. The role of grandparents is to proffer the family the ways of living sustainably and to look after the children of the family, which can only be possible in presence of them. For example, in these contemporary era, couples of every family has to work for their needs due to high level of inflation and they do not find adequate time to raise their children. In such condition, if people live in an extended family, children do not have to suffer from deprived attention and care of elders. Secondly, with more numbers of family members, the advantage of big scope of entertainment and leisure activities is associated. To illustrate, a family of a score numbers of members has four to five cousin brothers and they find very easy to develop any specific kind of interesting recreational activity, which gives them the feeling of pleasure. And finding the happiness of children, elderly also enjoys peaceful life. This way, the reasons draws implication that being a part of extended family always makes life comfortable.
On the other hand, nuclear families also have few numbers of hidden advantages and due to that only, people prefers to live by it. The prime reason is being an economic concept. Nuclear family, having four to five numbers of members in total, involves a low amount of overall expense. Considering this, the nuclear families do not have to pay gigantic bills or other house-hold taxes. Additionally, smaller the family is, less the noise is generated. In-house environment is noise free generally and small families have less numbers of gathering unlike to titanic families, in which events and gatherings are organized at regular frequency and for some people, these such events are annoying. However, people choose to spend time lonely, even if being a part of an extended family. Also, the expense and incomes are directly proportional to the numbers of family members; hence, though the expenses increase with family size, incomes will also elevate. That said, the advantages of nuclear family are baseless.
To conclude, from the above mentioned arguments, it is clearly implied that the advantages for me to support the extended family are ample and convincing. The reasons for others to support the nuclear family are preposterous. For the betterment of the societies, the first step for nuclear families would be to get united as much as possible and to live under same roofs to pursue parallel goals of peaceful and strong nations.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (10 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... free generally and small families have less numbers of gathering unlike to titanic ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 41.998997996 205% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2643.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 525.0 315.596192385 166% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03428571429 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65391919147 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497142857143 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 861.3 506.74238477 170% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3032521183 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.653846154 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1923076923 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426315793129 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125490749781 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684312369667 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29133732248 0.151304729494 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171241567943 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.