Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion
The present education system in the world has become a controversial topic. As one set of people believe to have separate education system for boys and girls, while others refute it. Since, they feel co-education model reaps more benefits in future. We will look into the these contradicting viewpoints in depth before a conclusion is reached.
On the one hand, people feel the view of separate education for boys and girls is attributable to discipline factor. In other words, being educated along only with same sex might make them disciplined individuals. More than 75% of educational institutions in vietnam, for instance, have implemented the non co-education system as it proved that without interference of opposite sex, students were able to concentrate more while being firm handed to academics. It is, therefore, thought single sex education makes male and female students to focus better in studies and evolve as a strict adult in growing process.
On the other hand, mingled sex education appears to be more fruitful as thought by some due to it aids in proper understanding of opposite gender and develops intellectual abilities. That is, when various type of minds engage together, learning process becomes relatively less difficult and enticing. People feel co-education might aid in thinking process of children which might lead to excellent academic results and even career. Many schools in the UK allow children of both sex to engage in group discussion of topics related to their studies which helps to generate effective ideas to tackle exam difficulties. Hence, co-education definitely brings with more positive aspects.
In conclusion, mixed education system is the ideal way every country has to follow as it is cemented by strong reasons such as superior study results, better understanding of other gender and intellectual abilities. I look forward to an education model with gender as least consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...boys and girls, while others refute it. Since, they feel co-education model reaps mor...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... co-education model reaps more benefits in future. We will look into the these contradict...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... focus better in studies and evolve as a strict adult in growing process. On t...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ue to it aids in proper understanding of opposite gender and develops intellectua...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing process of children which might lead to excellent academic results and even c...
^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ols in the UK allow children of both sex to engage in group discussion of topics ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3431372549 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93209381906 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604575163399 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6868255514 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217507618014 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072382649199 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617143454144 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128914837991 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374897294302 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.