In the past, employees used to stick for one skill set of a job for many years. However, in the modern age, things have changed dramatically and employees work on plenty of jobs in their careers. This trend is not only limited to the white-collared industry but also to blue-collared employment. In my opinion, this is one of the best practices as it would give anyone plenty of opportunities to learn and explore different capabilities.
Sticking to only one working opportunity would definitely help anyone to expertise and to become a subject matter expert on the specific field. Nonetheless, it would not add any new dimension to their portfolio and it would be vulnerable to the future. On the other hand, changing shifting to different occupations in between a professional career would create a sophisticated platform as well as more job security because of having one or more skills. Moreover, it would also assist to connect to more workforces. Thus, improving social life.
Apart from these, to reach a high powered placement one should have multiple sets of expertise and this should only be possible by having practical experience. For instance, a delivery manager in an IT industry should be aware of basic knowledge of all technologies which have been handling by his teammates. On top of it, it can also offer excellent compensation because of the work flexibility that someone can add to the team.
To conclude, although choosing only one employment might be beneficial up to some extent, having different work experiences would add a plethora of benefits such as job assurance, commendable positions, and a good handsome paycheck.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...ce. For instance, a delivery manager in an IT industry should be aware of basic knowl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, thus, well, apart from, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12177121771 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02002412974 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5483153278 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119403980209 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438878454782 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350188861047 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737547593647 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447675853608 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.