Friends are meant to be lifetime companions. We make friendships across all stages our life starting from kindergarden to college, from office to post retirement. Our buddies remains with us in all moments of our life span. However, it is highly debatable whether one should choose friends having same mindset as us or choose someone who does not be in same page as yours in few occasions. I personally feel that we should make pals who does not align with us on every time but have different views in few occasions.
Friends with same mindset seems easy going for some. I feel personalities having problem with acceptance of criticism should make friends having identical views. Moreover, people with less intentions of arguing or have confrontations issues tends to choose friends with similar thought process. I feel this seems perfect because a group with similar thinking will remain happy and strongly bonded since there should not be any sort of argument or serious debate that might effect individuals.This will also help in making a collective effort for few occasions where team cohesion is needed.
Such peaceful atmosphere wont be present if we make friends whose views differs from us on some occassions. Humans are not perfect and after parents if we listen or accept someone that is our friends. There will be instances where we might make mistakes and none but such pals will criticize us and help us to think and rectify ourselves.For example, if we make some important decisions we can consult my buddy having different opinion which further helps me to think in more diverse way.This advantage wont be available if we make friends with similar mindset.
In conclusion, I must admit that buddies with other opinions at some point is most important.Doing this we can learn, rectify ourselves in our lifetime because improving yourselves constantly is the way of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun intentions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... identical views. Moreover, people with less intentions of arguing or have confronta...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of arguing or have confrontations issues tends to choose friends with similar tho...
^^
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...f argument or serious debate that might effect individuals.This will also help in maki...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...us debate that might effect individuals.This will also help in making a collective e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... help us to think and rectify ourselves.For example, if we make some important deci...
^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...r helps me to think in more diverse way.This advantage wont be available if we make ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Doing
...pinions at some point is most important.Doing this we can learn, rectify ourselves in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05750798722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70719599687 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565495207668 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.4899876772 49.4020404114 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.769230769 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218583736684 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924726879464 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673230607526 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13378753244 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470921992096 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.