Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinion as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It is believed by some that selecting like-minded buddies seems a neat way to follow; on the contrary, others critique the former opinion as they contend that individuals can benefit more from friends who do not always confirm what they say, think or act. From my perspective, I side with the first group based on valid facts which will be further discussed in this essay.

To begin with, let me highlight how a friend with the same thoughts as you could be the most stress-reliever feature in the world. In fact, we choose our friends based on similarities ranging from a favorite movie to watch to the desired pastime to spend time on. Consequently, we, normally admire friends that give us a confirmation for every single activity to follow rather than rejections or disagreement. Let me encapsulate these presented facts by illustrating a survey which is conducted by a group of Canadian scientists two years ago. According to this Canadian published article under the name of merits of good friends, nothing but surrounding by a circle of a friend with same interests, desires and concerns can increase individuals' life expectancy by almost 75 percent. To dig more, when you enjoy the company of a friend with the same mindset toward various topics it alarms your brain you are not the only person who holds this viewpoint therefore your stress level will be reduced by 53 percent and you have been offered a chance to enjoy your life in a more therapeutic as well as sole-restoring way.

Despite all the fruitful as well as beneficial consequences having a same-minded buddy can easily bring to people's life, others are of the opinion that being in friendship with a person who always agrees with you not only do not help your self-improvement but also holds you back from progressing in life. To put it clearly, when your friends show up with the same points of view there is no space for you to think outside the box . In other words, there is no chance for you to analyze things from different angles. To clear things up, I would present an instance from the book five tiny steps to make a good friend, in this book has been mentioned that dealing with a friend who holds a divergent view from yours can broaden your prospect on life and make you ready to face further future challenges in your life in a more logical way. Broadening your horizons is not a feasible vital factor to reach unless you do have an unlike-minded friend.

By way of conclusion, although people have various opinions upon selecting whether like-minded or unlike-minded friends, I believe buddies who stay on our sides can make our life a breeze as they can give us positive energies.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...a same-minded buddy can easily bring to peoples life, others are of the opinion that be...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o space for you to think outside the box . In other words, there is no chance for ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, as well as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 465.0 315.596192385 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76989247312 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7255482992 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544086021505 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.9904027559 49.4020404114 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.428571429 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2142857143 20.7667163134 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302169133502 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10130568268 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542011951549 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182819255684 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370437263011 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.