Some people think its better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them.
Other people believe that it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them
Although some individuals believe that it is good to choose colleagues who have the same views as them, others think that friends who sometimes do not agree are better. In my opinion, I think friends who sometimes have opposing views to us are good as they can help us more in different aspects of life.
On the one hand, some human beings think that it is best to select friends who always think in the same manner as them. They believe that the same opinions with friends will not only help them to understand each other better but also have a similar approach to various issues that arise in different aspects of life. For example, according to a recent survey of college students, 35% of youth believed that they would like to keep the friends of the same opinions, as it helped them in studies and cope up with difficult situations on emotional matters. Thus, having friends with the same opinions help a person to know and help each other at different times.
On the other hand, some individuals believe that it is better to have friends who sometimes are of opposite view than theirs. They point to the fact that it is necessary for people to see the other side and learn from them, which helps them to grow faster. For instance, students are encouraged to have a different approach to the same problem in schools, which increases their mental abilities to see things from a different perspective. Therefore, having friends who sometimes
do not agree with our opinion help us to grow and see things in another manner, which might not be possible with people having the same views.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinion, I think having colleagues who sometimes differ from our opinion is beneficial because it helps to see the holistic view about different matters. Different opinions among friends bring out the best of us and help us to grow mentally by helping to see things from a different perspective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p us more in different aspects of life. On the one hand, some human beings think...
^^^^
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and help each other at different times. On the other hand, some individuals beli...
^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ible with people having the same views. In conclusion, while people may vary in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee things from a different perspective.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73964497041 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42912200832 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437869822485 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.1818565115 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473079674793 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219708720512 0.084324248473 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11948289811 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298560741241 0.151304729494 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116666664949 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.