Some say that it is more beneficial to have friends with the same viewpoint, while others would argue that it is better to cope with mates who have different arguments. This essay will argue that although the companion with multiple thoughts, comes up with the best solutions, the friendship with the people who have identical opinions is appropriate for moving forward.
On the one hand, having various viewpoint is the best option to generate several different ideas. Usually, friends who do not agree with others, always bring some other belief where this conflict creates many new possibilities. For example, while performing a group activity of the college program colleagues always produce with multiple options where they would finally decide the best option even though someone does not agree with that. However, I believe working with friends who do not agree with others opinion, creates various arguments and views but it takes considerable time to finalize.
On the other hand, friends who share the same opinion perform well in terms of moving forward. This means that they do not prone to conflict with other one's idea. Therefore it is easy to agree upon something and can start working on the final decision quickly. For example, Larry Page and Sergey Brin were friends who always agreed on each other and they built the world's most popular and strongest technology company called Google. I believe the companion of people who have the same belief is always preferable because it converts ideas into working more easily and quickly.
In conclusion, although having an accompany with friends who do not agree with others helps to produce a great number of options, sharing the same thoughts is the best because it transforms ideas into working solutions faster.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...iewpoint is the best option to generate several different ideas. Usually, friends who do not agre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...prone to conflict with other ones idea. Therefore it is easy to agree upon something and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ckly. In conclusion, although having an accompany with friends who do not agree with othe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14776632302 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38443898995 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.090265498 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36893130747 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152092723929 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091241605519 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252764355782 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567598252032 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.