Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
With the increase in human income and purchasing capacity, radical elevation in the level of wasting raw, as well as cooked eatables, has been surfaced each day, worldwide. In my opinion, such occurrence happens due to several reasons. However, if certain result-oriented measures are followed the situation could be reconciled to a large extent. Both the causes and remedies are discussed further chronologically.
Discussing the root-causes first, the first and the most logical one is the unpredictable number of guests in social gatherings and events. To be more explicit, there is often the case when hosts, organizers or caterers are unable to reckon the exact quantity of food to serve or prepare; as they are unaware of the number of guests going to attend the functions or gathering. Weddings, birthday parties, exhibitions, kitty parties and lots more; for example, are the major culprits of such a saddening trend. Apart from this, the unimagined quantity of food is been thrown by retail markets- In order to save the transportation cost- retailers stock a huge amount of edibles and groceries in their store. They are compelled to use it by given instructions: expiry date, sell-by date, best before and so on. This is especially the case with perishable products such as milk and fresh vegetable. The erratic climatic condition and poor consumption habits are other few contributors to the rise in such an unpleasant situation.
Nonetheless, some timely and precise measures can hold the situation. The most apposite one is that of being explicit while organizing communal events. One must -keep aside social formalities and- explicitly specify the number of guests should attend such functions. A good example of this is western countries, where people straight forward ask the number of attendees. Another workable one for retailers is they should store the food according to their day-to-day sale so that such eating commodity are availed before the expiry date. Redundant storage should be avoided stringently. Also, introducing food atm cabins all around the city would be of great help. Moreover, one should be circumspect towards their eating habits and make sure they put food on plates merely the quantity they could consume.
To conclude, and render my opinion, it can finally be stated that indeed today the enormous amount of food is being thrown as garbage due to an individual's abandoned attitude towards it.
But if defined steps and suggestions are followed this predicament situation can be dealt with.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 142, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
... food is being thrown as garbage due to an individuals abandoned attitude towards it. But if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, well, while, apart from, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26781326781 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81317232116 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.354464065 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.095238095 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61904761905 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113763263613 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316716729389 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324198924774 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681772043516 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232851295141 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.