Some people think that libraries are wastage of resources and money So computer should replace them. However, others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In this digital world, almost everything is available in electronic form. Therefore, It is often argued that the maintenance of libraries is a huge investment and unnecessarily demand resources, and should be taken over by electronic gadgets such as laptops, PCs and tablets. However, others disagree and believe that libraries are an important source of information. This essay agrees with the latter viewpoint and discusses both the arguments with the examples.
Firstly, public libraries are an accessible source of information to each and everyone in society. Anyone can easily go to the study centre and choose anything to read without any restriction. On the other hand, electronic personal devices are costly and economically weaker category cannot afford to buy such expensive devices to read the e-books. Secondly, one can rely on the authenticity of reading material such as books, journals and magazines available in the libraries. All the books present in the libraries are written by well-known authors and hence, reliable. At the same time, the content available on the internet is not always genuine because everyone can post anything online and it is difficult to verify the veracity of the content available online. Therefore, this essay agrees that libraries are an asset to society.
However, others hold a different opinion and think that libraries lead to wastage of critical resources and need continuous maintenance cost. Therefore, advancement in the field of computers should be used to prevent this. This is because the paper-based books result in logging of the trees to generate paper and digital books are the best alternative to stop deforestation. For instance, Amazon's Kindle is a prime example of reading books online in digital form and money invested in reference centres can be spent on other developments. However, this essay disagrees with this viewpoint because of the advantages libraries offer are certainly for the benefit of an individual and society, and paper usage can be reduced in many other ways. For instance, electronic bills can be generated over the hard copy of the bills. Instead, computer technology can be used to automate the manual process of issuing books in a library but not for its replacement. Therefore, it would be invalid to replace the information centres for these reasons.
To conclude, advancement in technology should be welcomed to computerized the existing process but the importance of libraries in their fundamental role cannot be put aside and administration should invest in the libraries without any second thought.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35609756098 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9098245857 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509756097561 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9169912701 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160922817728 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506499577686 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567177917599 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967529913545 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386884066823 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.