Some people think modern technology is helping people to be social, while others believe it deprives them of communicating in real life and therefore make them unsociable.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is no doubt that the recent progress made in the technology has given an opportunity to the people to remain in contact with their families. Nowadays, the distance and remote locations are no longer hinder the social bond among the people. While scores of the people consider it a blessing whereas some regards it as a reason for decreased actual encounters wherein two or more people physically meet and greet each other. In this essay, I will narrate both the views and my support arguments for the former view.
Those who believe that the advent of sundry social platforms has made people actually unsociable might argue that there are no real friends anymore. For example, one can make millions of connections on Facebook and Twitter etc. across the globe but no one knows each others' personality. Furthermore, the time spent on interacting with these enormous number of friends constrained them to stick to their devices. As a result, no time remains for real relationship. As a contrast in the past, most of us used to visit each other personally to inquire about them whereas now just sending a text message or a good wishes note is enough.
On the other hand, I would argue that technology has helped in bridging the gap of distance and time by connecting the people. For instance, now a student studying in the USA can easily and promptly establish a conversation with their families who might be in Asia, the Middle East or any other part of the world. In addition to this, the young generation can take after to their counterparts in other developed nations. They can exchange views in a real-time, learn the knowledge or skill not available domestically, and can even earn money.
To sum up, I strongly believe that the benefits of the usage of technology outweigh its disadvantages. It had helped the people in becoming more sociable, although, the excess usage of social media could have negative consequences too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... across the globe but no one knows each others personality. Furthermore, the time spen...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89090909091 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68159732013 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593939393939 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0776470633 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226750805325 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633757549409 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345604278018 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126975168796 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324118775167 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.