In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Old age homes are a modern-day reality and are extremely beneficial social institutions and assets for any society. In my opinion, a society or any of its institutions can only flourish when all stakeholders take interest in its upkeep and hence I believe that both the government and families have a part to play.
Old age homes are an essential part of any national fabric and infrastructure and have high initial costs involved. Specialized buildings with enough room for residences and entertainment are required. Also, as being one of the most regulated sectors, these homes requires a wide range of costly approvals from the local health and municipal bodies. Trained care givers must be appointed. These homes also must deal with accessibility issues and hence the vehicles and buildings must cater to this as well. These initial costs coupled with the cost of keeping the facility running continuously in compliance with all regulations is a daunting task and a heavy burden on either the exchequer or the families of the residents. I believe all the above initial and running costs should be borne by the government.
However, there is a vested interest of family members in that they have access to specialized facilities where their parents or elders receive the care that they deserve. It allows the other family members to dedicate more time to their work while being assured that their elders are cared for. My own grandparents are in such a facility and I would feel happy to contribute to a fund which will ensure that quality care is provided for my grandparents
To conclude, I would suggest that voluntary contributions be invited from family members by highlighting the importance of these homes and their contribution to the society
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, so, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04467353952 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84835159983 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553264604811 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.6297041508 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192236492254 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685672730242 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301170569503 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101076809477 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413243842175 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.