In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. sometimes the government have to pay for this care. who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?

Essay topics:

In Britain when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. sometimes the government have to pay for this care. who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?

Old homes are an important amenity of today's society, and no one can deny the fact. Aged people Living in old homes is a common practice in countries like the United Kingdom. These living facilities are accompanied by various necessities including proper take care by the trained staff. However, they are solely funded by the government, whereas common people are not contributing in the finances. This essay will elaborate, why the government and people should equally participate in running these homes?

The people availing the services of old homes are those who have served the country for more than 40 years in numerous departments. They have put all their energies and youth years in working for the prosperous economy of the state; after 75 they are at the age where they depend on society for their need. It is the responsibility of the state to look after them. No doubt, the government department is allocating sufficient budget to fulfill the financial needs. For instance, 2% of the total budget of the UK is spent on old homes. So, the state is doing well.

However, this could burden the government in various ways. The allocated budget is cut down from other public sector services. Hence, education and health care facilities may suffer. The nation can play a vital role by contributing some amount during their job period. It would be helpful if the people are willing to pay a small percentage of their monthly salary for the sake of this service in future. We have various examples of countries where some proportion from the pays of employees is deducted for future pensions and retirement needs, such as old homes. This model is successfully working in Malaysia, where both the people and state are donating equally for the stress-free future of their aged community.

Summing up my opinion, I would suggest neither the state nor the people should encumber entirely to fund elderly welfare services. Both the citizens and the authorities should work together to facilitate better and livable declining years of the community members.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey are solely funded by the government, whereas common people are not contributi...
^^
Line 9, column 395, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...hly salary for the sake of this service in future. We have various examples of countries ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 719, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss-free future of their aged community. Summing up my opinion, I would suggest n...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, well, whereas, for instance, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04664723032 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61132715032 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568513119534 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4422944164 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.15 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351430118491 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886074071161 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515686997482 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183256115841 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841730500844 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.