It is true that there are many endangered species which are on the brink of getting wiped-out from the face of the earth in due course of time. Without serious human intervention, their end seems inevitable - the clock is ticking fast! We, the international community as a whole, are facing a big question - whether it is right to spend huge amounts of money to protect these endangered species or do we accept their fast-approaching demise as a natural evolutionary phenomenon and not try to take their fate in our hands. The nature and seriousness of the question demands a quick and decisive answer.
In my opinion, the answer to the above question has to be in the favour of concrete human action to put the brakes on further depletion of these at-risk species. We, as human beings, should join hands and try to formulate as well as set into motion all kinds of practical plans to reverse this decline. This is because it becomes the moral duty of humans, as they are the greatest hoggers and destroyers of all the natural resources on the planet, to leave some for the others to stay alive - Live and Let Live! What humans have turned this earth into is really shameful - over the last century or so, we have converted this earth, this heavenly abode, into nothing less than a sewer! Rampant industrialisation has consumed the essence of our green planet and left it to rot, as if we have some other planet to go to! I ask as to what is the fault of these poor animals and plants who have never snatched more than their fair share from mother earth? I say it is high-time that humans feel accountable for their wrongdoings in the past in the name of economical growth and give back some attention to the planet that it rightfully deserves. If we do not take heed and spend money to take this pressing matter into our hands, the time would be near when we will be faced with the situation where there would be nothing left to spend on. Global climate change is knocking on our doorsteps, calling for us to take the right action in the interest of our future generations, the foremost step involves rescuing the endangered species from the jaws of extinction. We should, therefore, mobilize our energy into saving these species and take all necessary steps to avoid the inevitable. All kinds of monetary support should be given to organisations such as World Wildlife Fund that are working against all odds to turn the tides against industrialisation and preserve the wildlife.
In conclusion, I would like to stress that the time has come upon us where exemplary action needs to be taken, with regards to depleting wildlife, in order to escape from the wrath of the judgement day. Saving endangered species will not only halt the negative process of destruction but will also be a first step towards preserving the ecosystem so that our children have a future on this planet, something which we ought to let them have.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1052, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... wrongdoings in the past in the name of economical growth and give back some attention to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 41.998997996 193% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2410.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 515.0 315.596192385 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67961165049 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61507018554 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 176.041082164 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526213592233 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 20.2975951904 192% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.188545903 49.4020404114 284% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 185.384615385 106.682146367 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6153846154 20.7667163134 191% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138598232781 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462358370702 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233074235678 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885093975603 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277115270148 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.1190380762 174% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.