some people think that one of the best way to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary era, environmental problems have become controversial issues in human society. A group of people believes that if authorities will increase the cost of gasoline for private vehicles, then, the environment complication will be decreased. In my viewpoint, it may assist to some extent, however, this is not the only solution to tackle these environmental issues.
To embark with, increasing price of petrol can reduce the environmental pollution to some degree. In other words, excessive usage of cars release carbon dioxide into atmosphere which is detrimental to the natural world. If the price of gasoline is hiked, individuals will start to use their vehicles less often and this in turn can decelerate the rate of the air population. Nevertheless, the increase in fossil fuel prices will not stop environment pollution. Furthermore, the fuel prices determines the market price of other essential commodities such as transport, medical and food, and increasing the price can affect poor and middle-class families.
On the other hand, law enforcement agencies can take other measure to mitigate these problems. A better solution is to invest in renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and tidal waves rather than non-renewable resources likes coal and petrol. For instance, solar power in the United States has proven its efficiency in every production. Besides this, by improving public transport and reducing the cost of traveling, the government can encourage more common people to use public transportation. In other words, this practice assists clear environment and reduce traffic congestion in cities.
To conclude, I strongly believe that the hike in the fossil fuel is not the best solution to global environmental problems. Improving the efficiency of public transport and investing in renewable energy sources are better alternatives that ought to be considered.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, for instance, such as, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53924914676 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05194270477 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587030716724 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8369187105 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.2 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181714349616 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584826366905 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399712712122 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105002799823 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375318532105 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.