Some people think that only staff who
worked in a company for a long time
should be promoted to higher positions.
Do you agree or disagree? Give your
opinion and examples.
Promotions help boost the morale of
employees. Higher positions earn higher salaries and hence everyone wants to
be promoted. Some people feel that only
those employees who have worked for
an organization for several years should
be given promotion. I don’t agree with
this view. In my opinion, the time spent
in an organization should be just one of
the criteria for determining an
employee’s eligibility for promotion.
Employers often believe that employees
who have spent a lot of years in an
organization are more likely to be loyal
to it. They tend to reward this loyalty
with promotions and rises. I am not
against promoting senior employees.
However, in my opinion, new hires too
should be promoted if they have the
skills and qualifications.
Just because someone has spent ten or
twenty years in an organization, it does
not mean that they are the most
competent. Sometimes new employees
deliver better performance than senior
employees because they possess more
skills and qualifications. What’s more, a‘new employee’ may have years of
experience in another organization.
If competent employees are denied
promotion because they don’t have
years of experience in the organization,
it will affect their morale. Worse, it may
encourage them to quit and join another
company that honours talent. Attrition
will only hurt the interests of an
organization.
To conclude, in my opinion, employers
should consider a variety of factors
while determining an employee’s
eligibility for promotion. This includes
their qualifications, special skills and
domain expertise. Promotions and rises
encourage employees to work harder. If
they are denied promotion in spite of
their hard work and eligibility, they might
just quit
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, while, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79779411765 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1908524334 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7966711029 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3157894737 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26315789474 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 43.0 4.38176352705 981% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124397746925 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451665491157 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402237759663 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0309363954376 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442888437942 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.