Now a days employees are looking for a good amount of hike then long term vision to stay with companies. Even fresher are changing companies more frequently at lucrative offers. I think when it comes to promotion employee who is staying from longer period of time. In this essay i will support my opinion to based on some example.
Firstly, Associate who is staying with organisation longer has more chances to know about company policies and rules. What i mean to say is that since they have worked longer they have seen all up down with companies, They have better relation with customers and seniors to get work done earlier. For instance, a company will always consider an exiting employee for VP or CEO position instead of getting new face from outsider. Having a know face also create a trust in junior employees.
Secondly, employee staying longer with industry has more chance to stay on that position. When a senior position is given, company wants them take a role and full fill some responsibility in future. In this case if he leaves early it is huge loss for company. Associate staying longer with company are more likely to stay than others.
On the other hand, just having the criteria of number of years staying with company can go utter wrong. an employee staying longer does not mean he is right candidate for senior position. What i want to convey here is new employee might have more ability, knowledge and capabilities to grasp new position earlier. In other words employee can stay with organisation because they fear to face challenge in other organisation.
In conclusion, considering all facts employee staying with organisation should be given more priority. without compromise require talent for senior position. Hence we should given chance to employee who is staying loner and more loyal toward the organisation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
Now a days employees are looking for a good amount...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ion employee who is staying from longer period of time. In this essay i will support my opini...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 280, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...om longer period of time. In this essay i will support my opinion to based on so...
^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ger period of time. In this essay i will support my opinion to based on some exam...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... about company policies and rules. What i mean to say is that since they have wor...
^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... getting new face from outsider. Having a know face also create a trust in junior empl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... role and full fill some responsibility in future. In this case if he leaves early it is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: An
...taying with company can go utter wrong. an employee staying longer does not mean h...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ght candidate for senior position. What i want to convey here is new employee mig...
^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'words'' or 'word's'?
Suggestion: words'; word's
...to grasp new position earlier. In other words employee can stay with organisation bec...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facts'' or 'fact's'?
Suggestion: facts'; fact's
...tion. In conclusion, considering all facts employee staying with organisation shou...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...nisation should be given more priority. without compromise require talent for senior po...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 159, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ise require talent for senior position. Hence we should given chance to employee who ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...nt for senior position. Hence we should given chance to employee who is staying loner...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i mean, i think, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9935483871 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57809551468 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3393555473 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4736842105 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.01903807615 279% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0935119294811 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358406017801 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303633010197 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623712328968 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263870372044 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.