Some people think that radio is the best way to get news while others think that television is better for this purpose.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the past decade, there has been a drastic revolution observed in the media field. There are two dimensions of the topic, one group of people is of the view that radio is one efficient medium to get news; whereas, other group asserts on the importance of Television. This essay shall discuss both perspectives in details before reaching a final verdict.
To begin with, Radio is one standard medium of media and news that never gets outdated. It is still considered to be the best channel whenever anyone wants to latch on to the latest news circulating around the air. It is renowned owing to its easy mobility and pocket friendly. For example, even people with low class income can afford a radio in order to get entertained, listen to live cricket commentary or news about current affairs.
On the other side, Television is the advance version of communication channel for masses. One cannot overlook the importance and usefulness of TV; when it comes to visualization and sound quality. Using Television as compared to Radio or other medium is certainly more advantageous. For instance, people would be more satisfied and delighted to see the video of event or exciting news instead of just listening and visualizing the images in mind.
To conclude the aforementioned argument, I opine that Television usage and advantages certainly outweighs the advantages of radio. Owing to the features, visual technology such as LED & HD has raisin the bar of quality and productivity of Television. In future, people would be more inclined to use Television as an entertainment medium instead of Radio or other gadgets.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...quality and productivity of Television. In future, people would be more inclined to use T...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, still, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05223880597 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86823150733 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9928714016 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240312179561 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734075022295 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519072755384 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138445859757 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226578741723 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.