Some people think that spending a lot on holding wedding parties ,birthday parties and other celebrations is just a waste of money others think these are necessary ! Give reasons
Historically, celebrations have been a vital element for society, anyhow, a sector of the population reckon that investing capital in a ceremony whatever the motivation is, means a financial waste for the host, while others a different sector argue that celebrations are part of people's needs. I strongly convinced that celebrations are a waste of capital. In this essay, I will review both viewpoints of this issue and give my reasons.
Firstly, ceremonies are considered as part of the community, due to since the beginning of the ages, humanity has used celebrations as part of living in society because of a social person must share time and achieved goals with others, a clear example of this is from kingdom ages, the king used to organise celebrations and big ceremonies to share and display his power and his financial strength to others. Nowadays, celebrations have the same context in our modern society.
However, not everyone has the same social needs, on the contrary, a big part of the population believe that the protocol is only wasting, not only financially but time expenditure because that is investing in appearances and only an ancient way to keep a social status. For instance, new generations are preferring to celebrate goals achieving or special dates, travelling to any special place or just with a simple and special dinner with family or friends. Hence, ceremonies and parties are the old and expensive fashion to celebrate something.
To conclude, despite the ceremonies and parties come as a part of a social human, it does not mean they are the only way to celebrate a commemorative date or goal, on the contrary, celebrations could be done by different and economic ways to commemorate important occasions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...l status. For instance, new generations are preferring to celebrate goals achieving or special...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11149825784 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94627685279 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543554006969 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 118.248743892 49.4020404114 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.0 106.682146367 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8888888889 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121384940059 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578184416403 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392477803211 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745722881919 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341820581258 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.