Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today’s life while others believe that history is a valuable source of information for us. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In today's modern world, every city has museums which comprise rich history of that particular culture or realm. Their sheer intention is to conserve the imperative artefacts and mythological scriptures that reflect our past. However, many people think that perpetuation of these items is an absolute waste of resources. In contrast, I firmly believe that they are indispensable and I will provide evidences and justifications to validate my bird's-eye view.

To embark upon, the first argument to establish their vitality is that we can teach our descents some crucial moral values by narrating them the heroic deeds of a slew of courageous legends. For instance, Rani Laksmi Bai, the queen of jhansi was very brave, fearless and inviolable ruler. Even when foreign invaders attacked her kingdom, she did not surrender and in spite, of acknowledging the factuality that she might not win, she fought till her last breath and died with dignity. This invariably inspires the youth and urge them to follow their footsteps and hence we must protect the remains of such martyrs.

Furthermore, saving the ancient belongings and manuscripts enables us to show the young generation the brilliance and diligence of their ancestors. It is no exaggeration to claim that even after possessing plenty of modern equipments and advance technology, we are not capable of replicating these incredible monuments and structures, I can reminisce, recently I got an opportunity to visit "Kailaash Temple". It's marvellous beauty and outstanding architecture mesmerised me. Also, it has been proven by various researchers that it is impossible to recreate it. Therefore, it should be our priority to take good care of them.

To recapitulate, I would like to mention assertively that the benefits of preserving these paramount valuables from our glorious past far outweigh any negative repercussions. Since, it is mandatory not only for the guidance of our lineage but also to save our true identities.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For instance, Rani Laksmi Bai, the queen of jhansi was very brave, fearless and i...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35987261146 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.067454358 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687898089172 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4815565123 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115903495751 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0301757114001 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281429836233 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648616860853 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330447643805 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.