Some people think watching movies is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There a number of ways to spend ones leisure time, while a number of people believe that watching movies is a waste of time and other activities should be carried out instead, I would argue that it fosters social interaction amongst people.
To begin with, there are some who think that the time spent watching movies should be channeled towards other developmental activities. A good Example of such an activity includes learning a new skill or pursuing a professional qualification which can improve a person’s earnings and lead to promotion at work. Also, they believe that these periods should be used for other physical activities other than watching a motion picture. For instance workout and training sessions are preferable to hanging out at the cinema. These group of people aim to get tangible value for their time.
However, there are a number of reasons why watching movies is beneficial. Firstly, it promotes social interaction. The lifestyle of most people allows for very little time for bonding with families, friends or colleagues due to the busy work schedule. A night at the cinema allows for people to interact which creates intimacy and face to face discussions. Secondly, it is an entertaining time that allows people to take their minds of work another pressing issues. The ambience of the cinemas creates an atmosphere for relaxation while watching the latest block buster. These benefits can improve relationships and help people relax.
In conclusion, although it is believed that seeing a movie is an activity that is futile as the time can be used for other productive activities such as gaining new skills or working out, I believe seeing a movie is often beneficial as it fosters bonding and face to face interaction. More and more people should make out time to visit the cinemas with acquaintances.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09570957096 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77200611593 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0806678925 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197263187193 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071719482858 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596026507557 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135110357859 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270440362589 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.