Nowadays the issue of animals in captivity has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this trend will cause some problems, the advantages will be far more significant.
On the one hand, there are a whole hosts of explanations against keeping animals in cages. First, since wild animals are confined in a limited environment, depriving of their physical and mental stimulation is unavoidable. In fact, zoos fail to provide adequate spaces for them to perform their movement habits, which comes at the expense of suffering from boredom, stressful and downright situations. Second, by forcing animals to learn tricks for the sake of financial purposes, it is transparently undeniable that lifespan of those animals could be shortened. For example, elephants are still being used to play volleyball with a view to entertaining audiences and visitors, which is detrimentally prone to sudden trauma and then leads to species degradation.
On the other hand, wilderness areas are of merits in terms of their security and education. First, without zoos, such animals are potentially on the brink of extinction. In fact, zoos bringing endanger species in a secure environment protect them from poachers, predators and human’s exploitation, thus resulting in saving and preserving them to the extent. Second, in order to gain a wealth of knowledge, zoos are offered to have more opportunities to observe and learn animals’ instincts and behaviors. For example, scientists find it touchable to conduct surveys in replacement of direct exposure, which successfully facilitates for breeding programs now and down the road.
In conclusion, the founding of zoos to keep animals will have two sides. By eliminating the economic objectives and considering the pros and cons, these places would be perfect shelters for wild animals to develop and rise in their breed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 37, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...t. On the one hand, there are a whole host of explanations against keeping animals...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, still, then, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39455782313 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02868572191 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1779795549 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116522868078 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372737304526 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0245549719746 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730299234181 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115924782425 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.