Some young people are leaving the countryside to live in towns and cities leaving old people behind in the countryside. What problems are caused by this issue? What can be done to solve the issue?
Many young people are settling down in cities and towns and leaving behind their elderly people in rural areas. This trend is creating various problems such as crowded urban centers and making rural areas non-functional. Fortunately, this growing trend can be handled if village areas become as developed as city areas.
In order to seek higher education and better employment, young people are moving to urban areas. This phenomena generates pressure on urban centers, for instance, load of traffic increases on the roads. As more people means more movements around or within the city. With the increase in urban population, either naturally or through migration, demand of housing also accelerates. This results into mushroom growth of slums which damages the city not only aesthetically but also physically. In addition, rural areas become non-functional due to absence of young energetic work force. Unlike young people, elderly people cannot run shops, markets and Agri-based activities oriented in countryside areas. As as result, these areas are becoming more or less like paralyzed parts having no contribution towards economic growth.
However, identification of this growing trend is crucial. As per the research conducted by Canadian Social Organization, improving quality of life by availing urban facilities is a major motive of young people of moving from rural to urban areas. As long as rural areas are not fully developed with facilities, for instance, higher educational institutions, medical facilities, markets, industries and many more, young professionals will keep shifting to cities. If they are provided with these facilities and employment opportunity, they will not leave their home towns and elderly people easily. Therefore, it is the high time for concerned authorities to look into this and allocate development funds to countryside areas. This can create a great deal of change in urbanization.
To conclude, owing to lack of facilities and opportunities in suburb areas, rate of urbanization is ascending. Due to this situation, young people are preferring to live in cities rather than in their rural home towns. By developing countryside areas, this problem can be eradicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...young people are moving to urban areas. This phenomena generates pressure on urban c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'generate'.
Suggestion: generate
...e moving to urban areas. This phenomena generates pressure on urban centers, for instance...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: As
...tivities oriented in countryside areas. As as result, these areas are becoming more o...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ng. Due to this situation, young people are preferring to live in cities rather than in their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53958944282 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93181809015 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568914956012 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.143774066 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.45 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23379788848 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767709870983 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071872867529 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172212164075 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526212510946 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.