Students in schools and university learn more lesson with their teachers when compared to other sources ( e.g., Television and internet). Do you agree or disagree?
Due to the mobile revolution internet is easily accessed through mobile, which helps students to engross their knowledge in various subjects. But some people believe students acquire more knowledge in various educational institutions through their teachers is more when compared to other medium of sources. In my opinion, I strongly disagree to this thought, which will be explained in the following passage with suitable examples.
Mobile and television are integral part of our life, where youngsters have avenue of opportunities to learn their subject details. For instance, while I was doing my project during my end semester graduation, I was totally relying on internet to get the required assistance. The information obtained was enormous, when compared to learning from teachers. Furthermore, students gain knowledge based on their curriculum is limited, and therefore they obtain minimal resources from their teachers, where else internet is referred as an encyclopaedia to access both subject and non-subject details. Therefore, the knowledge obtained by students through internet is more than with their teachers.
In addition, some channels provide informational programmes such as, learn grammar easily and learn match practically helps students to learn their subjects easily. Nowadays, various users friendly mobile applications are introduced in the market to aid students understand their topics with various demonstrations. For instance, Byj’s mobile apps help children and youngsters to learn their subjects with interactives sessions. Thus, it is believed even though teachers educate both subject other general details from their experience to student, but considering the accessibility of information from internet is incomparable.
To sum up, as the proverb says” knowledge is wealth”, students at present gain phenomenal information through internet and television are more when compared with their teachers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92553191489 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01533770176 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3364031436 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337312673113 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129715581109 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617402090638 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221242899639 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118026942715 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.