Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back.
Why does technological advancement hurt nontechnical communication?
How can we solve this problem?
Communication has been never been so easy as it is happening these days. There are copious ways by which people can do liaising with each other each other. However, this flexibility has also introduced dependency and un-ability to develop or retain the modern technology the social life. This is because people have the options of convening message over phone or internet rather than in person. In this essay, we will discuss some solution of this barrier.
The first and foremost are for stopping technological advancement to stop our basic communication is to minimize using the modern technological devices such as mobile phone or internet. Excessive use of such types of equipment can make us addicted towards them. This means it kills our time and makes us occupied our trivial and non-important things, for example, one of my friend keep using a mobile phone for accessing application such as WhatsApp, Facebook and Twitter he did not realize it until he failed in one of the subject in his last year of college. Hence, by reducing the time we spend to this advance modern gadgets can save our time, which we can utilize for socializing and keeping touch with people while meeting them face to face.
Secondly, we should develop a good routine habit to meet our friends and relative every once in a while. By doing this, the love and affection can keep increasing rather than dwindling . for instance, I meet with my family members every month in any predetermined place by mutual agreement of all in owing to developing our social bonding. This can make the relationship more stronger and there is something new all the time when we meet that everyone has to share. Furthermore, it can broaden our horizon and fortify our social life.
In conclusion, the separation among people leads in diminishing to non-technical communication skills and by limiting the use of modern technological communication devices and growing a habit to meet on regular internal meetings with our relatives can provide relief to this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has never been
Communication has been never been so easy as it is happening these d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'each other'.
Suggestion: each other
...ys by which people can do liaising with each other each other. However, this flexibility has also int...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...an keep increasing rather than dwindling . for instance, I meet with my family mem...
^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...keep increasing rather than dwindling . for instance, I meet with my family members...
^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...bonding. This can make the relationship more stronger and there is something new all the time...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02662721893 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79680866106 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.5823363881 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.266666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174295808196 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059828728305 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478821683442 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111335794642 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390266315812 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.