Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate. But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in wider variety of methods, our communication and social abilities have taken a step back.
Why does technological advancement hurt nontechnical communication?
How can we solve this problem?
many people argue that the globalized world that they are living in today does not bring any benefits. this essay will suggest that the development of globalization is positive because it makes global communication easier and also brings more jobs to people in third-world countries.
The first positivity of globalization is that global citizens will be able to communicate with people at any location in the world without any problems. As most countries now decide to make several international languages official in their national education, the majority of the world’s population will speak the same languages. this means that local residents at any place can easily have conversations and understand foreign people from other nations. For example, since English and Chinese became the most spoken languages that are taught in schools in many countries, the majority of foreign travelers have found no problem communicating with the locals at their traveling destinations.
Furthermore, this development will make more jobs available for local people in poorer countries. this is to say that big companies in developed nations are trying to expand their businesses to poorer ones by establishing more factories and offices in third-world countries. since bringing employees from their countries to their new facilities costs a lot of money, these companies will choose to hire local citizens to reduce the cost. For instance, technology giants such as Samsung and Apple now open more than 100 thousand job positions in their factories for the locals in Vietnam and Cambodia.
In conclusion, globalization is a totally favorable development to today’s world because it significantly boosts global communication and creates more jobs for people living in less developed countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
many people argue that the globalized world ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...g in today does not bring any benefits. this essay will suggest that the development...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...ow decide to make several international languages official in their national education, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...pulation will speak the same languages. this means that local residents at any place...
^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e for local people in poorer countries. this is to say that big companies in develop...
^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...s and offices in third-world countries. since bringing employees from their countries...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55272727273 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03238716209 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1702986367 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.818181818 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.088980471202 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400709454342 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284112082012 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552801777622 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226797797677 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.