Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
With the advent of new technology, some people afraid that the gap between the rich and the poor will be increased. However, others oppose this belief. In my view, I lean towards the proposed idea.
To begin with, it is understandable why some people say that the margin between the two classes would not be affected by modern technology. One reason is that people could have an equal status when using hi-tech devices. With the help of smartphones and laptops, individuals could join online networks without any exposure of their financial backgrounds and connect to others. At most of the time, users’ status is kept private which means that neither the rich or the poor know about the opposite person’s financial information while using online technology. For example, many people still socialize with the rich society on Facebook even though, secretly, they are broke.
However, I side with those who think that technology will increase such a gap. One reason to support my standpoint is that all newest hi-tech inventions are far from poor people’s reach. In fact, these gadgets can only be seen possessed by wealthy people because these products are prohibitively expensive. This leaves the poor the only option to own old or even obsolete, but much more affordable technology items. In real life, people always compare themselves to others via technology accessories, which means, in this case, poor people are completely dominated by the rich. For example, kids with the latest iPhone X will become the center of the universe whereas those who can only afford old models will become ignored and stay at bottom of the society.
In conclusion, I believe that the rich will always be far ahead of poor people in this era of technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...ivate which means that neither the rich or the poor know about the opposite person...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06529209622 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63131525729 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6941897994 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179031066164 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620960704874 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518799184939 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122181545409 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395735371265 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.