Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Owing to the improvement in the quality of workers, technology has been becoming the element having the most influence in every aspect of society. Although some people might argue that the flourishing development of technology expands the gap between the rich and the poor, I am of the converse opinion.
Supporters of the former opinion might assume that the rich would be the first ones having the ability and source of money to emerge new improvements of technology to their work, thereby being richer. The reason could be their wide relationships, especially with experts in several fields of science and economics consultants. Another idea is that automatic processes could take the poor’s job away, followed by the growth in unemployment’s proportion.
Despite the preceding arguments, I still support the view that the improvement of science could bring up more chances for poor people to involve in lucrative projects. First of all, referring to the popularity of Internet, the poor can approach the free knowledge and techniques in manifold fields which possibly help them to jump at an opportunity to get a high-level job with high financial package. Secondly, poor people might apply modern equipment to reach greater productivity. An illustration is that in Vietnam, a new type of paddy, which was introduced by Agricultural ministry, help farmers produce higher quality rice, which is eligible for exporting, with spending less time than the original one.
In conclusion, it is my belief that although the development of science could expand the gap between the rich and the poor, it might create chances for poor people to break this space.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26966292135 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93788176509 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588014981273 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5102235447 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.7 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131277198333 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542990431973 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456022002401 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889312401781 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031422470399 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.