Teenagers should not be allowed to use mobile phones at school.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Using cellphones at high schools should be banned. This is a wise decision which will be supported by this essay. In fact, the number of features which a smartphone nowadays benefits from is wide enough to distract students in classes. This would become even more serious when those features can be abused for cheating.
Firstly, smartphones are benefited from a vast number of entertaining options. This could be range from high-quality cameras, music players, Internet surfing to Instant messaging and calling. Students can use each of them during their lessons time and miss parts of them. One study on British students has shown that students' concentration in class has fallen by 45 percent when they were allowed to use their mobile phones in class resulting in lower scores.
Secondly, many of those aforementioned cellphones' features can be used for forbidden behaviors in schools namely cheating. Indeed, never would have been this easy to cheat in schools thanks to the cellphones. Applications such as camera, high-performance calculator, IM and so on, will enable pupils to cheat just like a piece of cake. To exemplify, once I was in high school, I used my camera to take a photo of my exam paper and sent it to my classmates in an online group we used to have in a social messaging application, Facebook messenger, and they were all successful receiving it.
To conclude, allowing students to bring their smartphones not only cause their distraction but also it will provide them with an easy to use tool to cheat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...tudy on British students has shown that students concentration in class has fallen by 45...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02734375 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82602812026 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63671875 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6145568858 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173337288056 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647809367523 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774763191233 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996081210608 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275567771975 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.