There has been a dramatic growth in the number of people studying at universities in the last few decades. While some people see this as a positive trend which raises the general level of education within the community, others fear that it is lowering the quality of education.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of the increase in student numbers at university?
Nowadays, education is considered a luxury ubiquitously. Hence, grabbing the attention and motivating every single person to pursue tertiary education. Thus an upsurge in percentage of annual admissions have been reported. Few hold the firm believe that, this proliferating trend will rise literacy rates among citizens. However, this has depicted a decrease in quality according to others.
Attaining knowledge is the right of every human being on earth. Similarly, this concept has aspired with the passage of time. The pros in adopting this optimistic approach are prodigious such as, high literacy rate of country followed by greater recruitment percentage leading towards flourishing economy. Moreover, excelling in research and development sectors of state. Nevertheless, promoting personality development accompanied by expanding horizons of knowledge and thought patterns of individuals.
Every coin has two sides, indisputably this growing fashion is supported by negative aspects too. Competition has rised to extreme level among schooling organisations, overshadowing the quality of education provided. Furthermore, many educationists forget their moral values, virtues and customs in this race of being the best. Even though, yearly plethora of new teaching organisations are added to the list but inevitably this dilemma is increasing with the passing day.
In conclusion, although the number of tertiary education institutes have drastically aspired as compared to previous 10,20 years and raised literacy rates worldwidely. On the other hand, only drawback observed is poor education standards but the positive aspects overshadows the negative aspects of this growing trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...le person to pursue tertiary education. Thus an upsurge in percentage of annual admi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Few holds'.
Suggestion: Few holds
...f annual admissions have been reported. Few hold the firm believe that, this proliferati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e prodigious such as, high literacy rate of country followed by greater recruitme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99176954733 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0652663306 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.679012345679 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0128184063 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1875 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130928233348 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03623094268 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032538663177 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788601730042 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403221341927 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.87 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.