There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as the deterrent, many people believe that the other measures will be needed.
Discuss both views?
In recent years, there is a colossal upsurge in the trend to see the prodigies discussing that capital punishment is the solution to deteriorate the crime rates. Howbeit, some people debunk from them and proffer that other measures should be used. In this essay, I shall explain both the sides of the arguments by analysing it.
On the one hand, compelling pieces of evidence are obtainable to demonstrate the notion of crime is morally wrong and strict punishments are indeed needed to reduce the crimes. Firstly, the paramount concrete reason is that crime is a threat to society. Secondly, to go hand in hand, the supernal rationale which drags me to persist is that strict punishments will set an example for others and keep them in the bay. Thirdly, the hindmost inextricable feature is the expenditure of feeding the Criminals is utter waste to government. To exemplify, according to the recent survey conducted by the Time magazine, the government spends 10% of its revenue in providing shelter and food for the offenders.
On the other end, some people on the board discriminate that the death penalty is an arbitrary punishment so other methods of judicial execution should be used. Moreover, some people reckon that circumstances lead them to be a delinquent. Furthermore, withal they justify that criminals should be given a chance to repent and breathe a new life. However, there are concerns about their recidivism and social behaviour. For instance, to set a rapist or a serial killer free would endanger the public well-being.
In a nutshell, I pen down saying that in certain cases capital punishment is warranted. Ergo, it’s contrary can be overlooked or curbed. Consequently, the crime rate will alleviate if the punishments are strict.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...utter waste to government. To exemplify, according to the recent survey conducted...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14186851211 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85834512468 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595155709343 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4287567828 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201841775155 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586456356049 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653096841602 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118030847733 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554805929855 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.