There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes committed each year. While some think the best way is to use the death penalty as the deterrent, many people believe that the other measures will be needed.
Discuss both views?
In recent years, there is a colossal upsurge in the heinous crimes. Some people coincide that capital punishment would be an appropriate action to restrain it, whereas, others are the adamant opponents claiming that alternative solutions should also be required. Ergo, the following essay will discuss the aforementioned views with supportive evidence.
To commence with, the major reason for the farmer view is it sends a clear message that crime is morally wrong. Moreover, the paramount concrete reason is it eliminates the possibility of criminals re-offending. Murderer and rapist, for instance, received a death sentence will create an alarm for the rest of offenders as well as dwellers. Consequently, these people have a good reason that judicial executions will deter major criminal offences.
In contrast, to people who wish to make a death sentence as a deterrent are those who reckon that distinctive actions like re-educating and re-socialising criminals are essential. Certainly, some crimes might be occurred due to personal circumstances such as self-defence, extreme poverty or mental health. Furthermore, it helps the convict to get another chance of living with a clear mindset. Withal, they also justify that the death penalty does not effectively reduce the crime rate. For these reasons, there are a plethora of people believe that separate actions are vital.
To synopsize, few people take this view as the fit of the fact that the death warrant is the most effective way for alleviating serious violence. Others disagree with that and think that different solutions are expected to stop the crime rates. This essay discussed the various reasons along with the valid examples of why people hold these points of view.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38181818182 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82423045907 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7662553446 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236474475663 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676285361643 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452746516139 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138348243158 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378141722069 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.