These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away,whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Expalain the effects and change in attitudes.
Nowadays people prefer to throw broken goods and materials, while in the past these items were taken care through repairs so that people can retain them for more extended periods. This essay will describe the reason for such changes and their effects on the attitude of the people.
One of the main reasons for not retaining the damaged goods is that people can buy similar products with more options through the internet. This is because of improvements in technology and the global advancement of economies. For example, global e-commerce website like amazon provides the choice of over one million products with free delivery options and at a low price. Consequently, people would invest in buying new products instead of spending money on repairs of old products.
This expansion in the product line may impact the spending habits of people. The reason for this is that people are inclined to convenience even if it comes with a cost. For instance, evidence suggests that 60% of working women spend half of their salary on online shopping. Besides this, throwing away things can develop a carefree attitude towards the environment. This, in turn, would increase unwanted waste, thereby adding more pollutants to land and water. Conversely, if people begin repairing their old belongings, then there would be less environmental pollution through unwanted waste.
In conclusion, easy availability of products through e-commerce has supplied people with an option of buying new products with ease, which has given rise to discarding of old products, and such convenience has resulted in physical inactivity and carefree attitude towards the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conomies. For example, global e-commerce website like amazon provides the choice ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tal pollution through unwanted waste. In conclusion, easy availability of prod...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, conversely, if, may, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34980988593 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65878178115 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4240418506 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.230769231 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167950322846 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591250953854 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616289756534 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108913872829 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851413608064 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.