These days the tradition of families eating meals together is declining. Why is this happening? What are the effects on families?
It is true that the culture of the family meal has almost been forgotten in recent years. There are several reasons for this trend, and it can have a range of long-term negative impacts on junior family members.
There are two main reasons why families tend not to eat together these days. Firstly, parents, nowadays, have to work to tight schedules or do shiftwork to make a living. Because of these inevitable anti-social timetables, the parents usually lack the time to attend family meals. Children, at the same time, spend sizable chunks of their time on their own. They stick in their rooms enjoying video games or chatting to their friends online. These young people, therefore, would rather consume their food solely.
As people less frequently seat at the ‘family table’, the socialization function of families would certainly be affected. The most obvious consequence of this trend is that parents would not have enough face-to-face interaction with their children. They will lose the opportunity to adequately know their offspring, their feelings or needs through the table talk, and to find out how to discipline them properly. Consequently, their children are less likely to be respectful and well-behaved. They will grow up with several negative personality traits. These young people, for instance, are likely to become self-centred adults who show little consideration for the feelings or needs of others. Such an attitude would make them unable to work successfully in groups with other colleagues. Another negative trait in such people could be impulsiveness which may lead, for example, to wrong financial decisions, or even criminal activity.
In conclusion, various factors contribute to disappearing of the family meal custom, and younger members of the family will undoubtedly be influenced by the issue.
Comments
Like many others, I was…
Like many others, I was always concerned about my future professional and personal prospects. I wanted to do what I enjoyed and help people, but I needed to work hard and learn in order to do so. For this purpose, I began studying in Canada, where I spent more than two years. Everything piqued my interest right away, but when it came time to write essays or articles, I discovered I couldn't do it on my own. I turn to https://ca.liuxuesavior.com/wen-ge-hua-dai-xie/ in these instances since they are always willing to help.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37586206897 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8405192036 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627586206897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.319126714 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195458036194 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646199371525 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869760138257 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141046045653 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463938190418 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.