Today, it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
It is true that multigenerational workplaces have become the norm in recent years. Despite their apparent disadvantages stemming from generational gaps, I believe that the advantages of this trend outweigh its drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why it is difficult to work in a multigenerational company. One primary reason is that since people from different age groups typically have different mindsets, it may be challenging to collaborate with a colleague who is at another stage of life. This issue might cause some conflicts within a team decision-making process. For example, young professionals tend to act quickly to seize the opportunities instead of deliberately think about the situation as senior employees do. Another reason is that experienced peers could discriminate trainees who are inexperienced. This results in unhealthy behaviors within the company, and it hinders the productivity of their team.
Nevertheless, honoring diversity in workplaces brings several gains for companies. Firstly, a diverse working group can observe a situation at multiple perspectives, which leads to meaningful discussions and solutions. In contrast, if all team members are at the same age, they might not realize the critical opinions of other age groups. Secondly, by maintaining employees of different ages, such companies can ensure a healthy talent and management pipeline at all levels and positions. Senior employees may mentor younger ones in order to develop their leadership skills, and managers are able to identify future leaders from such internal potential candidates. Finally, the companies will bring the best out of their people when they maintain harmony between professionals of all age groups within their workforce.
In conclusion, people should embrace the multi generations mix in today’s workplace because its benefits shadow the drawbacks mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'collaborating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: collaborating
...fferent mindsets, it may be challenging to collaborate with a colleague who is at another stag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69230769231 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20021577345 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660839160839 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3534568857 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.533333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154811809556 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440223824853 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443487832843 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101426964968 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332439666247 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.