Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family?
There is a controversial issue about the impact that grandparents cause by nurturing children on the household. Some social workers state that it is negative for the household, while some politicians claim that it is beneficial. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of positive effects.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers advocate that it is negative for children to be raised by grandparents. The first reason is that the help of grandparents usually helps couples to build career. Many young parents cannot build a career, since they are engaged in parenting, but retired members of family can take a responsibility for upbringing, which enables them to succeed at work. Another reason is that grandparents frequently teach youngsters better than biological parents. The elderly have more experience than the other members, so they can share both invaluable wisdom and advice with growing generations. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that child caring by grandparents is a positive trend.
However, some politicians propagate that it is negative for children to be nurtured by grandparents. They justify their opinion with the following reasons. Firstly, they cannot teach children modern lifestyle. Many older people are unaware of contemporary trends, which are important for youngsters to master, so they cannot fully replace parents in development. Secondly, they are usually not able to care for children. Many grandparents are unable to nurture children, since they are both too old as well as physically incapable, so they cannot entirely substitute parents, no matter how eager they want. As a result, it is rational to say that upbringing by the elderly is a negative tendency.
In conclusion, even though some social workers believe that it causes a negative impact on the family, if grandparents care for young members, I think that it is advantageous for all members of family for the above mentioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...e children, since they are both too old as well as physically incapable, so they cannot en...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25786163522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92924486103 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5773381884 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082553445273 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305378029003 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347493177494 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495504250603 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172988375627 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.