Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree?
Two days ago, I read an article about implementing community work in the justice system. Some lawyers claimed that judges should extensively use it making verdicts. This essay agrees with this point of view for the following reasons.
The first reason is that community service is more beneficial for society than confinement. The labor market has many jobs that experience a shortage of employees. Therefore, if the convict with petty crime were allowed to do a certain job for free instead of imprisonment, then they would benefit the public because their contribution would be voluntary as well as cover less popular occupations. For example, in Karaganda city, the convicted often receive community work, such as sweeping main streets, painting the fences in the park and picking liter in the backyards.
Another reason why voluntary jobs by prisoners should be an option as a verdict is that the convict with minor offences should avoid rub shoulders with more serious criminals. Punished for the pickpocketing and shoplifting, a prisoner may learn from either serial killers or bank robbers how to commit more serious crimes after the sentence in jail. Thus, it is important to separate them apart instead of imprisoning together by offering community work for minor crimes as a form of penalty. For instance, the police department, in Almaty city, has registered the number of major crimes as soon as the justice system have taken unpaid as a penalty for minor crimes.
However, some prosecutors believe that offenders should have the opportunity to pay their crimes by doing community work. The main argument for this point of view is that they are more likely to break the law again. They say that criminals should serve their sentence in prison, irrespective the type of the, because prison will help them understand the consequences. Despite this, justice system should sent every convict to prison, since the government would have to build more prisons to accommodate all of them.
In conclusion, judges should consider community work as a measure of punishment for minor crimes, since it is profitable for both the public and helpful for some criminals to avoid meeting more serious criminals in jail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-03 | Tolik | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | VishvAdthakkar | 73 | view |
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor.What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can the poor be helped? 84
- Some people think that parents should give their children complete freedom Others feel that parents should limit their children s freedom Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teachers particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 78
- Some people think that dangerous sports should be banned, while others think people should be free to choose.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Many people prefer to travel by car rather than buses or trains Why do you think this happens What can government do to motivate people travel by buses or trains 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...nce in prison, irrespective the type of the, because prison will help them understan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16897506925 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67614401028 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565096952909 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9291404183 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185558469185 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613050037656 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462627659104 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105262737755 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240775600558 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.