In the modern rapid-changing world, we are not just concerned about the modernization of our gadgets, vehicles or apparel but also the cities we live in. In order to provide more advanced amenities to the citizens, governments can restructure the urban areas but it is not an easy task to do. There are many disadvantages associated with these developments. This essay shall delve into the pros and cons of such developments.
In early 2000, Indian capital Delhi was suffering from its ages-old transportation system which was a big hurdle in the overall development of the capital region. To solve the issue, the Indian government has decided to introduce the metro rail in its capital city Delhi. Surprisingly, Metro proved to become the revolutionary step towards making Delhi a smarter city to live in. It not only made the traveling within the city cheaper but also convenient and much more pleasant. Moreover, it curbed the problems of traffic and pollution in the city. Inhabitants can now commute from home to office and vice versa in much lesser time without facing undue traffic and extreme weather conditions. This development helped the city to generate more employment and contribute towards the gross domestic product of the country.
Talking about the negative side, in the process of installation of Metro lines, the Government had to arrange for the land from the general public in the various parts of the city. For that, they introduced a law relating to compulsory acquisition of land. People had to transfer their land to the state and that too at the rates decided by the state itself. It was somewhere unfair for the people because they had left with no choice except losing their valuable land at a trivial price due to the application of the law. Just like this, in each and every development in big cities, the general public had to suffer a lot.
To conclude, I can say that we had to pay a price for every development. Modernization of cities should be attempted for a brighter future but not at the cost of the general public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nt had to arrange for the land from the general public in the various parts of the city. For t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...nd every development in big cities, the general public had to suffer a lot. To conclude, I ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ghter future but not at the cost of the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77811817624 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558404558405 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5894369819 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11612938294 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351848178324 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405618779628 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677169114684 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355946161197 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.