Where there is a dangerous mountain, there would be a impressive scenery. As the old saying goes in China, I agree with there are more interesting places to visit or stories to experience where the conditions are diffcult, as a major advantage of visiting there. However, the disadvantage brought by safety issue is also noticable.
On one hand, people would like to experience something different when they are travelling. Previously, most of us travelled in groups. The schedules were set accurately, even when to take photos. Nowadays, more and more people are getting to know the world deeply via media especially by the internet. Thus some of them are not satisfied with the usual travelling. Hence, they would like to take adventures at their trips, when their curiosities would be fufilled again. Moreover, this unique experience could not be gained from anywhere else. Like seeing the penguins in Antarctic, which is a totally different memory compared with doing that in the Zoo.
On the other hand, it's risky to travel these dangerous places for most people. No matter Sahara or the Anarctic, the tirps are accompanied with severe weather conditions. In the desert, the temprature is extremely high that people could be dehydrated quickly without sufficient water. So does the Antarctic, penguines can swim in the icy cold sea while people could not do that. If the traveller happen to fall to the water, the outcome would be imaginable.
To conclude, even there are more views and experience you can explore at these dangerous places, you are risking your life for the travelling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...is a dangerous mountain, there would be a impressive scenery. As the old saying g...
^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y via media especially by the internet. Thus some of them are not satisfied with the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08745247148 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70089403868 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604562737643 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3539267413 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7058823529 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132580914204 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0353738373999 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054860716815 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921579718699 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571549568933 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.