Today people can work and live in anywhere they want because of the improvement of communication technology and transport Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Opinion and discussion essay

In the modern era, due to advancement in communication and commuting system, masses can engage in their profession and reside at any part of the world. According to me, the merits of this trend outnumber its demerits.

To commence with, there are various advantages of this trend. The first and foremost pros is financially independent. Individuals can work anywhere and take their own decisions. Moreover, they will not feel homesicken as they can remain in touch with family and peers by operating various apps, for instance, WhatsApp, Instagram etcetera.

In augmentation to it, the third benefit is work efficiency. They can complete more tasks in less time. Needless to say, living at different regions will be useful because they can exchange their culture and religious values with the others.
Despite the merits, few demerits can also be observed. The first disadvantage to note is isolation. Living alone leads to mental disturbance. Lastly, people will become inactive when they give more preference to vehicles than walking. It gives birth to many health issues such as obesity.

After pondering over the preceding information it is felt that loneliness and over dependency on transport are the of these pitfalls of upgrades in computing and communication. However, personally, I believe that its merits carry more weightage in terms of independency, cultural exchange and time-saving.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...on and reside at any part of the world. According to me, the merits of this trend outnumber its...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, third, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92101250418 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.677272727273 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7382156954 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.25 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199600479969 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554012794158 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03778509053 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094703948311 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475707534716 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.