In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualification.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today's scenario, some people are of the view that for job-seekers it is necessary to have practical knowledge rather than bookish knowledge. However, I believe some basic qualification is also important for the same.
On the one hand, without qualification it is not possible to comprehend your job. Subsequently, to master your area of work, one needs to have an overview of it in terms of knowledge. However, some jobs which require physical strength do not follow this norm. For instance, factory workers or people of low rank may not require higher qualification to undertake their work. Consequently, they can survive with on hands experience to make ends meet.
On the other hand, high rank jobs require people with specific qualification. For example, corporate organisations set different criteria for different jobs profiles. In that case, in order to aim for that post, one needs to have a degree which is apt for that post. However, managerial post require not only high qualification but also experience.
To recapitulate, due to the aforementioned reasons, in the near future, formal education is unlikely to become obsolete. Albeit, experience and knowledge will go hand in hand. Both are required and essential for one's professional growth and well-being.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 204.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28921568627 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07278660067 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3164851669 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0714285714 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156807309959 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538166825886 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516096343754 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981780955734 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04507525285 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.