Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants. Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information, the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular. It’s because the internet is a more effective method than the regular classroom. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is your personal opinion?
traditional classrooms, since its inception, have been an indispensable part of the formal education structure. However, in the era of the internet revolution, several academicians and reformists have reconsidered the internet's utility as the new generation classroom by observing its feature of easy and fast accessibility. Admittedly, the internet has a myriad of advantages. Still, I would like to go with the motion of the traditional classroom, not becoming obsolete and ineffective in the coming days, which will be discussed in this essay.
Firstly, the traditional classroom is a place where the teachers and students interact with each other and move their topic forward through spontaneous participation. this type of physical contact, which makes the topic substantially alive, remains missing in the online platform, which is the reason for distraction for learners there. For example, subjects like literature, marketing, history require more humanly touch to be involved in making it livelier to the audience. For that reason, regular classes will not become outdated any time sooner.
Furthermore, the internet is full of information, but it is quite hard to find relevant and authentic data. Additionally, accessing only information is not the purpose of classes, but the information should be accurate and concise. it can be seen that, in orthodox classes, a teacher can whole-heartedly guide his students to the right way of learning something efficiently. For instance, internet uses search engine optimisation, which restricts more factual data to come at the top while searched, if it does not comply with the underlying mechanism. Hence, an offline instructor is more reliable in this aspect.
To conclude, although internet can be seen as the fastest and easiest medium for learning, it has questionable issues in its feature for which the old classroom concept will not be archaic in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-05 | SYED GOLAM REDWAN | 89 | view |
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry What is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traditional
traditional classrooms, since its inception, have b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ward through spontaneous participation. this type of physical contact, which makes t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rmation should be accurate and concise. it can be seen that, in orthodox classes, ...
^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d classroom concept will not be archaic in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50168350168 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12329083508 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619528619529 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2828084502 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.714285714 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263963970252 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784220287138 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456630329315 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152059567714 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404504601614 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.