Travelling in group with a tour guide is the best way to travel. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The vast majority of the population deems that a presence of a tour guide is composed of a necessary part throughout the tour destination while others argue with this position and claim that visitors can be travelled independently. I advocate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own view of such a common issue and to discuss both opinions.
On the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, a more detailed look at this trouble affords the population to conclude the core benefits of tour guides. For instance, the qualified person knows a substantial total of the information about the local environment and he can be so useful assistant during the trip. Secondly, staffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they perform their duties. Hence, tour guides may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter.
On the other hand, it can be spotted that the population embark to travel without tour groups. Likewise, visitors often organise routes themselves, especially to remote places. In addition, tourists admit that a travel agency provides very expensive trips and some people do not have the possibility to make a purchase of them. However, destinations, which are organised by agencies, are more informative and fascinating in contrast to individual trips. Consequently, some visitors continue to choose companies for travellings.
To summarise, I would stress that tour groups have both positive and negative sides. I support definitely with this statement and my arguments confirm it. Nevertheless, tourists must decide upon for themselves what is the best way to travel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...cate strongly with these statements and am going to reflect on this essay my own v...
^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n the one hand, it can be inferred that a large number of the population is right. First of all, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taffers of various tour agencies possess special knowledge of a place, where they...
^^
Line 3, column 537, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s may help people in various situations, which tourists often encounter. On t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23465703971 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89457304096 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635379061372 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9362479114 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28450355009 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771077866208 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720834334254 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17711610484 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952867602497 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.