University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many third level education require students to choose specialized subject for their studies, while some people argue that this is faulty approach. In their view, educational institutes should encourage students to study variety of subjects. In my opinion this approach will help students in the broader way and also help society. This essay will discuss about the same.
Universities should promote all subjects and explain how pupils can improve their career prospects by learning various subjects. If all the youth take up the same course then there will be bottleneck and increase in the unemployment rate. Inculcating various skills would help learners to take up other jobs as well. For instance, in a survey, 26% of the adolescence in India were able to find the job after university based on their vocational subjects.
Additionally, when students learn bit of different domains instead of focusing on one subject, they would be able to help in the needs of the society, which in turn would help the growth of the economy. To illustrate, the statistics by The Times newspaper in 2015 showed that more than 50% of the graduates excel in their field and was able to help in the improvement of the society based on various subjects they studied by doing some research work or creative awareness, which has seen rise in the economy in the same year.
To conclude, the subjects that students learn should not only support their individual growth but also help the development f the nation. As a result tertiary education should promote all subjects instead of a handful of prestigious subjects for the enhancement of the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, third, well, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64572848978 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575091575092 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0906711021 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311019573644 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112964939341 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814823210595 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192827039066 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460249526295 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.