University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Selecting subjects in tertiary education has always been the paramount consideration for students and it is the time when pupils choose the specialization over generalization. Nevertheless some people argue that wide range of subjects could be more beneficial and higher institutes should also motivate the students to learn variety of courses. I believe that having command on one area is must but reasonable knowledge in other areas adds value in different endeavors.
Specialization in one area offers many benefits. First of all, various fields such as medical science, engineering, space technologies etc. require person to have in-depth knowledge of subject in order to contribute in the respective area. It is often seen that people with detailed information and clear logic become successful in science and technology related fields. For instance, Bill gates an entrepreneur designed the window based operating system and became echelons in IT field. Secondly, for any innovation, specialist knowledge is the critical factor as person is required to understand all aspects of that area and further improve or modernize the existing arrangements of products or services. Finally, emphasis over one subject helps students not only to gather extra information on subjects but also helps them to gain confidence to face post study interview or assessment.
Nevertheless, some people think that student may get benefitted if they are advised to study other subject besides their core course. The main reason for such kind of rationale is that some time students do not know what they aim for and become specialist in one area block other opportunities lying in different areas. A case in a point is my cousin who studied the pharmacy in university and later on realized that pharmacy is not his cup of tea and end up being made redundant from company. Another argument is that people sometime in life get in administration or business even in technology field and during that role, specialist knowledge is less valued and person expects to understand the other areas such as business, marketing, accounting and human behavior etc.
To recapitulate, though specialist knowledge is a key in modernization and improves existing science and technology etc. conception, study of other subjects open ample of employment avenues in later stages of life and helps in administration and management as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...the specialization over generalization. Nevertheless some people argue that wide range of su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce, engineering, space technologies etc. require person to have in-depth knowledg...
^^
Line 5, column 773, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting, accounting and human behavior etc. To recapitulate, though specialist knowl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, kind of, of course, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36411609499 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00018912296 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585751978892 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8640650631 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0625 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276005086227 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808186082275 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793591858331 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161723986174 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554120915407 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.