Water is a natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
water is essential for human survival. Some people argue, it is a natural resource, therefore, the government should ban the sale of bottled water. I completely disagree, because, although water is available in abundance there is a lot of effort required to refine and pack water into a bottle for the use of the public.
drinking water supplied requires packaging and processing. The plants are set up for processing which includes filtering, refining, and packaging. Labour is employed by companies for running these units, and it requires money to run these operations. thus charging for packaged water is necessary to keep these firms running. For instance, according to a study conducted by a university, packing 1-liter water into a bottle requires 3 hours and processes such as reverse osmosis, boiling, and cooling etcetera. therefore, implying charges are necessary and consumers should not mind paying a small amount.
Another benefit of this is the reduction in wastage of water. As water is considered an unlimited resource people waste a lot of water. A price tag on a water bottle helps in reducing the wastage, they think before wasting it unnecessarily. A recent survey indicated, 30 percent of drinking water is wasted every month, due to which drought-prone areas are suffering and people travel several kilometers to fetch it. Moreover, small charges also help in the reduction of single-use plastic. The water is mainly supplied in use and through plastic containers which are harmful to our environment, therefore, price-tag helps in reducing it.
To conclude, water is significant for every living creäture, it must be according to need and wastage should be banned, thus charging for canned water is fair and necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Water
water is essential for human survival. Some p...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l for human survival. Some people argue, it is a natural resource, therefore, the...
^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nto a bottle for the use of the public. drinking water supplied requires packagi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Drinking
...le for the use of the public. drinking water supplied requires packaging and p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...requires money to run these operations. thus charging for packaged water is necessar...
^^^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...osmosis, boiling, and cooling etcetera. therefore, implying charges are necessary and con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 63, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s is the reduction in wastage of water. As water is considered an unlimited resour...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34642857143 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85213623841 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1869502674 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27938462509 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100780777483 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916931793379 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190238497458 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807244747528 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.