Nuclear energy has been a one famous debatable topic ever since the nuclear technology came into the picture. Few might say it can bring a whole new dimension to the mankind by providing affordable electricity to the poor countries and in other forms. Others might argue that, it has adverse effects if it falls into the hands of wrong people. In my opinion benefits overweigh the disadvantages associated with using of nuclear technology.
First of all, the population in the world has been multiplying in every decade and it has become some kind of trouble to the bureaucrats to provide electricity to all. With the use of nuclear energy there could be a chance to overcome this issue. At the same time, recent experiments in nuclear field has suggested that it can also be used in medicine. This can be game changer for many fatal deceases lick cancer which have been the main reason for many deaths.
However, the communities which are opposing the nuclear form of energy have the strong reasons too. For example, the bombing which took place in 1945 in Japan resulted in massacre and killed millions of Japanese young citizens and women. The radio emission from the bombing is still present in Japan and we still hear few cases from the victims. On the other hand, nuclear plants require at most care because a small margin of error could lead to radio thermic rays into the atmosphere and can be cause for another massacre. For example, like the incident which was happened in Chenobyl. Apart from this, if this technology reached to terrorists then the result could be unimaginable.
To conclude, nuclear energy has more benefits in medical fields and it can help light it up in under development countries by providing affordable electricity. Nevertheless, the usage of nuclear bombs in the war can lead to massacre and followed by changes in earth temperature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little might'.
Suggestion: Little might
...clear technology came into the picture. Few might say it can bring a whole new dimension ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...hermic rays into the atmosphere and can be cause for another massacre. For example, like...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, apart from, for example, kind of, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91509433962 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60002046223 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4020675076 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227164004361 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720864278331 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504612954512 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135161339768 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358256908353 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.